jump to navigation

ethiopia and the ark of the covenant October 10, 2006

Posted by Brad Richert in religion.

The Ark of the Covenant, like many artifacts sought after because of Biblical speculation, is shrouded in mystery. According to the Book of Exodus, God commanded Moses to have the Hebrews build the ark as a communication device between God and Moses (Ex. 25:9-10). Contemporary references such as in Raiders of the Lost Ark (1981) have focused on such powers as the source of fanatical treasure searching. There are many theories about the fate of the Ark of the Covenant, of which the majority revolve around its transportation to Egypt and beyond or a secret location in Israel in which the Ark was hidden away prior to the Babylonian conquest. One such theory that is particularly intriguing is the Ethiopian legend. The Ark is only a small part of Ethiopia’s long and peculiar legend and history associated with both Judaism and Christianity.

The Ark of the Covenant is said to contain the “testimony” of God’s covenant with the Hebrews (Dt.31:26), a golden jar with manna and the rod of Aaron (Ex. 16:32-34, Heb. 9:4). However, 1 Kings 8:9 states that the only contents of the Ark were the two tablets of stone. The Ark, even from its Biblical record, is concealed in smoke and mirrors as High Priests themselves, notably the first one, Aaron, were only allowed to see the Ark on specific days. The Ark was covered when carried among the Hebrews and hidden in the Holy of Holies. This Biblical account of the Ark of the Covenant follows its many journeys from the wanderings of Egypt to the “Promised Land” of Palestine. The Ark of the Covenant was the subject of many narratives throughout the Tanakh, including its capture by Israel’s nemesis, the Philistines. It was not until the 6th century BCE that the Ark disappeared from the Biblical records when the Babylonians destroyed Jerusalem. Consequently, the Ark then became an artifact of legend comparable to the Holy Grail.

On November 30 many Ethiopian Orthodox Christians will make a pilgrimage to the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion in Axum, Ethiopia, during the Festival of Maryam Zion. The Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion is the oldest and most significant church in the ancient African nation. The significance of the church is twofold. It holds the legacy of the nation’s first Orthodox Christian’s emperor, Ezana, in the 4th century who is claimed to have constructed the original. It also is the only church in the world to claim possession of the original Ark of the Covenant. Various scholars and treasure-seekers, such as Dr. Bernard Leeman and Graham Hancock, have supported the validity of this claim. The notion that the ancient Jewish artifact is resting in Ethiopia may be absurd or at least counter-intuitive to the average reader. However, the claim made by the Church of Mary of Zion might be deceptively coherent once one is learns of the traditions and legends associated with Ethiopian nation.

Like most legends, the tradition of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church is a delicate mixture of fact and fantasy. The claim of the church’s origins is obvious to the average Bible reader. The Book of Acts of the Apostles gives us a narrative in which the apostle Philip meets an Ethiopian eunuch on the road to Gaza (Acts 8). The eunuch is stated to be a treasurer of the Queen of Ethiopia, Candace. In the passage the eunuch is conveniently reading a prophecy in the Book of Isaiah, a book in the Jewish Tanakh, at which time Philip proceeds to interpret the prophecy in the light of the new Christian movement. After his conversion, the eunuch is said to continue on his way, presumably back to Ethiopia.

Contemporary historians doubt the validity of the Book of Acts and consequently this narrative is dubious. Part of the ambiguity is seen with any history of the Axum Empire. The Axum Empire was located in Northeastern Africa and developed from the 4th century BCE to its domination in 100 CE and lasted until around the 7th or 10th century CE. It is more likely that a Syrian Greek, Frumentius, who converted the Axumite emperor Ezana to Christianity, had brought Christianity to Ethiopia. However, the Christian tradition brought with it the legends and traditions of its Judaic predecessor, to which the Ethiopians had seeming connections.

The Kebra Nagast, or the Glory of Kings, is a book dated back at least seven hundred years that contains the developed legend of the Solomonic dynasty of the Ethiopian royal family. According to the Kebra Nagast, Ebna Lahakim was the first Emperor of Ethiopia and was the son of Israel’s King Solomon and Queen Makeda of Sheba. His royal name was David, after his Israelite grandfather, and the name was later changed to Menelik I in Ethiopian tradition.[1] Contemporary scholars argue whether the ancient kingdom of Sheba is actually in Ethiopia or if it is in modern-day Yemen. Regardless, the tradition is that Ebna Lahakim visited his father’s kingdom and upon his return he was to receive one son of each of his nobles and each of his temple priests along with a replica of the sacred Ark of the Covenant. This may seem strange at first, but it is written that Solomon welcomed his firstborn son joyfully and offered him the heir to the Israelite throne. Ebna Lahakim, however, preferred to rule his mother’s realm in Ethiopia. Solomon had Zadok, the high priest, anoint Ebna Lahakim before the Ark of the Covenant as king of Ethiopia under the royal name of David (or David II).[2] Ebna Lahakim would return to Ethiopia not only as the ancestral heir to the throne, but also as the spiritual heir of the Israelite throne.

The return to Ebna Lahakim’s nation would not be without a significant event to the history of Ethiopia. According to the Kebra Nagast, an angelic intervention caused Zadok’s son Azarias, who was destined for Ethiopia along with the other priestly sons, to plot the removal of the Ark of the Covenant to take to Ethiopia. With the assistance of heavenly beings the plot was successful. Once the convoy back to Ethiopia was out of Israel and into Egypt the conspirators told Ebna Lahakim of the scheme. Ebna Lahakim has previously thought the convoy held the promised replica of the Ark, but the conspirators had in fact switched the two. Ebna Lahakim is said to have danced for joy before the Ark as his grandfather had and all the deities of Egypt shattered into pieces.[3] Henceforth, as the Kebra Nagast proclaims, Ethiopia would follow the God of the Israelites and turn away from their deities of stone.

There are three major and equally significant criticisms of the tradition of the Ark being held at the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion. The first obvious criticism is of the validity of the Kebra Nagast itself. The story is told in a myth-like fashion and creates doubters among the scientific community as well as other pseudo-scientific circles. The underlying criticism, however, is the political use of the Kebra Nagast. The earliest claims to the text present the writing of the text to the 13th century, aligning it with the emergence of a new kingship that claimed heritage from the Solomonic dynasty. The story in the Kebra Nagast solidified the new dynasty for the next seven hundred years until its fall in 1974. The argument is that the creation of the myth of the dynasty was used as political propaganda. This certainly gives a motive for the creation of the text but is hardly hard evidence against the narrative, nor does it explain the problematic claim of the possession of the Ark of the Covenant.

A second damaging criticism builds on top of the political motive of the Kebra Nagast. The second criticism is the argument from silence. The Ethiopian Orthodox Church claims that no one is allowed to ever see or touch the Ark[4] except for the a designated person who never leaves the confines of the Church. Again, the argument from silence is hardly a convincing one, especially when in accordance with the Tanakh’s laws about the Ark. The silence of proof does, however, create doubts in a society in which empirical evidences are key to any claim. It is important to note that after the bloody revolution of 1974 that during the Mengistu regime, no one came to investigate the validity of the Ark.[5] The fear of even the possibility of a powerful religious relic is evidence of the instilled belief of at least the possibility of the validity to the claim.

The final criticisms are mainly competitions for the claim to the Ark. Competing theories range from a hidden Ark of some vague location in Israel to a specific claim that the Ark is underneath the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. Skeptics might say that the Ark would have certainly been destroyed by the Babylonians or by simply by the deterioration over time. Furthermore, skeptics might say that the Ark itself, based on a Biblical record, never actually existed. Some of these competing theories are based on probabilities whereas others are based on faith in one text or another.

The Ethiopian claim, whether true or not is an intriguing one, if not only for it’s simple, yet mythical, tradition. A recent complication of the Ethiopian claim have allowed for new interpretations. One new interpretation finds a synthesis between the theories of the Ark of the Covenant. Like all good compromises, the synthesis would probably leave a bad taste in each of the different theories’ mouths. The complication in Ethiopia is the assertion that there have been linguistic problems in the communication of what the Ark of the Covenant is. It has been mentioned that the “Ark” is actually the original tablets that were the contents of the “Throne” of the Ark of the Covenant. The claim follows that the original tablets are what is held in the Church of Our Lady Mary of Zion and that the throne, if any, that it sits one would have been a copy of the original. Since there is no current evidence of the original tablets, if they have ever existed, it should be maintained that there is no evidence for their location in Ethiopia or Israel. The problem with the theories is that they continue to look at the journey of the Ark in a structural and linear fashion. Munro-Hay states that the spiritual or esoteric belief in the Ark entertains reverence not through science, but through faith and mysticism that allows them a connection to the Holy Land of Israel.[6]

The Ark of the Covenant, as the Kebra Nagast states, is a heavenly object and thus even that “original” Ark of the Israelites was only an imitation of the “True Ark of the Covenant”. Even the Biblical accounts of the Ark, which were written hundreds of years after their claimed narratives, present the Ark surrounded in mystery as though even they did not know the actual origins. The Ark was a representative model of the promise from the Hebrew God, YHWH, to his chosen people. To understand the Ark as a single material object that has survived through the millenniums would be to misunderstand the purpose and even the truth of the Ark as a covenant. It could very well be that the narrative presented in the Kebra Nagast gives not only an authority to the Solomonic dynasty, but also a spiritual lineage for the Ethiopian people represented through their “Ark of the Covenant” as it did for the Jewish people.

The connection between the ancient Ethiopian state and the Judeo-Christian tradition can be followed through any given number of examples. The existence of a powerful Axumite Empire is a validated claim that has given credibility to the historical account of the Tanakh and other rabbinical writings. The introduction of the Kebra Nagast to the west in the 17th and 18th centuries has presented a whole new journey of the Ark of the Covenant that was previously not even considered. The simple narrative of a “stolen” Ark has been accepted by the adherents of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church for centuries and cannot be brushed off because of the convenience of political utility or its sacred nature. That said, the possibility of such an object surviving millenniums of travel and war is remote. Furthermore, the interpretation of the Ark of the Covenant being a singular material object is western and is narrow-minded at best. The sacred and esoteric nature of the Ark of the Covenant continues to keep it shrouded in mystery and in the hands of those spiritually initiated in the tradition of the God of Abraham.

[1] Munro-Hay, Stuart. The Quest for the Ark of the Covenant. London: I.B.Tauris, 2005. p. 18.

[2] Ibid., p.18.

[3] Ibid., p. 19.

[4] Grierson, Roderick & Stuart Munro-Hay. The Ark of the Covenant. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1999., p. 45.

[5] Munro-Hay, p. 183.

[6] Ibid., p. 208.



1. APROXY-SAYS... - November 23, 2006

this ppl will return swiftly to the kingdom even unto the temple along with the opressed the children of Darfur.the God of abraham the God of isiac of moses and mine have heard thier cries.He has told me to help thease ppl that he might fight for them as he did for the isrealites leaving egypt.and i and the multitude and an army of 600,000 foot soldiers will go to Axum to plea with them to carry the Ark again once more as thier ancesters.we will take the arc to isreal even unto jerusalem at a time of great lametations and woe for rachel has been already weaping..then we will make peace because they will fear and be happy because of the Ark and we will build the temple and raise its walls above all ecxisting structures as to appear to be coming out of the heavens then the prophecy will be fullfilled and the books oppenned and judgement will be set the ancient of days is here the prophecy of the morning and evening wich was told to us by the prophets will be fullfilled who will abide in my comming and to the new holy feast?

2. Dr Bernard Leeman - January 11, 2007

A free copy of my book is available as email attachment from queensland_academic_press@yahoo.com

3. zacks ng`uni - January 15, 2007

Hai, i like your work and i have a question to ask where exactly is the ark of the covenant kept at present.

4. brad richert - January 15, 2007

My conclusion, and my own personal belief, is that what we know of as “the ark of the convenant” was probably destroyed long ago, and/or was rebuilt several times even within the Biblical era. The Ark of Covenant should be thought of more as a symbol than a sacred relic – it was what the Ark represented rather than the Ark itself that was important, and thus reincarnations of the Ark could be argued to be of equal importance.

5. Indiana T. Zones - April 16, 2008

A principal purpose of this article is to examine the legendary mystery of the lost Ark of the Covenant and determine its fate from scripture. The true fate of the Ark of the Covenant is revealed herein. There has been a longstanding reason why the Ark was lost and the hand of G-d purposefully concealed the details of its disappearance until the Last Days. There are several reasons for this in that other very important mysteries set to be concealed until just before the Apocalypse can be resolved by determining the true fate of the Ark of the Covenant. Some of these other mysteries include but are not limited to the true nature and form of the infamous Abomination of Desolation, a heretofore thought to be fictional Temple of Doom, the identity of the Antichrist and the all-important Great Mystery.


6. tad - June 26, 2008

am sure that z arc is still an Ethiopia,
Axum becz they r signs tndicat this come &
see ze truth.

7. a child of god - June 26, 2008

the arc of the covenant was and is the dwelling place of god amoung the falen and unpure flesh of men , allbeit that god used to come down and talk with the naked but pure man in the cool of the day in the garden of eden shows that before sin we were not separated in any way from god and in the same breath we and even the angels had a choice before we chose sin , we could eat of any tree except the one in the middle of the garden hence choice . The arc of the covenant is gods sign that he will be with us in physical beholdable form even in the midst of our sin thus he can save us from our sins , please ponder the thought of the arc being a representation of christ before he came ( prophesy ) and after his death which gave us the option to become the arc of the covenant by accepting him into our hearts making us the dwelling place of the great I AM ( thus is at start ) . tho finding the arc would be significant we shouldnt let it be the only proof of what we believe – be ye weary but god is not mocked . amen

8. kurabachew - July 14, 2009

people do not accept truth.if some one asys the stone is bread what can you do. every one reads and heres the bible on what the convent Arc does for people, people know that it is on earth GOD does not take it again.if there is anyone who ant to know truth come and see it.thier is no matter if you invest money on truth.because the money is come afte life and truth.so i advise you go to ethiopia and see your fathers religion and the Arc.
……i see and belive on the power of it……
……………..good by……………..

9. samson - September 11, 2014

Ethiopians were Jewish over 3,500 years ago before they became Christians. Ethiopia was a country long before any of the west so called super powers. Ethiopian, Iran, China are ancient nations. The west is jealous of our achievements. They have been telling black people their brain is not as powerful as theirs and they are not good enough to do this that and the other. People can now look at Ethiopians and say black people built Axum 2000 years ago. They built Lalibela, a church out of a single stone in a way Europe could never have imagined. They cant even explain how something that great can be built with no modern tools all those years ago today. So they have an agenda. They use Ethiopias name as a begging ball. They created war and an image issue about Ethiopia. They even tell us all the churches we built were made by aliens lol. Ethiopia shows to black people the opposite of what they have been told they are capable of. So when they discredit Ethiopia, black people , it is an insult, attack to your identity. Sub shara africa is a term they use to separate Egypt achievement from black people too.

We don’t care. So you don’t think the Arc is not in Ethiopia, we dont care. You want proof? You cant have it. After all, religion is about faith. No amount of miracle can change some of you. Its not our problem. Check the number of times Ethiopia is mentioned in the bible. And know that only those that are close to God get tested the way Ethiopia has ben tested over the years. And we are still close to God which is all that matters.

Marlin Heintzelman - September 22, 2014

Religion is faith without proof. The Ark could certainly be in Ethiopia.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: